[JPL] Want to P.D. at XM?
Doug Crane
dcrane at comcast.net
Thu Jul 26 02:48:22 EDT 2007
I'll try and clean up the mess I innocently created and hopefully we
can leave it at that.
First off, "Cardinal sin" may have been the wrong term to use
regarding 2 blues tunes in a row. "Pet peeve" would have been more accurate.
I wrote my reply to Lazaro's message at a time when I should have
been in bed. Most of my message talked about what I heard on XM last
week. It was my first exposure to it. And I think most of my
observations were positive about the programming itself. What I said
about the 2 blues tunes that were played back to back I still think
rings true. In style, tempo, instrumentation, etc. they were far too
similar. Even the unacquainted could have thought they were hearing
the same tune. Clearly the programming software needs a bit more tweaking.
Yes, I could have articulated my message more clearly. I wasn't
trying to start any sort of fight. I think some of the posters to
this thread basically understood what I was saying despite it being
worded so poorly. And you can thank sleep deprivation for that.
And context IS everything. A few years back when Thad & Mel's
"Consummation" was re-released, I thought it would be interesting for
my listeners to demonstrate how the changes to "I've Got Rhythm" had
evolved through the years in jazz. I started with a straight reading
by Dick Hyman, segued into Ellington's original recording of
"Cottontail" from 1940 and finished up with "Fingers" from the Thad &
Mel's 1970 recording. I could have thrown in countless other
examples but those 3 selections illustrated the point that I was
trying to make: the progression of "I've Got Rhythm" from straight
swing (Hyman), to proto-bebop (Ellington) concluding with the chord
changes being constructed and de-constructed about as far as they
could be while still operating within their framework (Thad &
Mel). I kind of did the same sort of thing with Jelly Roll Morton's
"King Porter Stomp" once upon a time too. Can't recall what I used
for a straight reading. I used a Benny Goodman recording of it
followed by two recordings by Gil Evans, the first from the Pacific
Jazz date featuring Cannonball Adderley from the late 1950's, the
second from the 1973 Atlantic recording "Svengali" featuring David
Sanborn. So there you have it: multiple versions of the same tune
(or chord changes if you prefer) but totally dissimilar.
And then there are blues melodies that are so strong in and of
themselves that one forgets that they are blues tunes. Ellington was
a master at this. Horace Silver's "Opus de Funk" is another that I
can think of off the top of my head. And there's Bill Evans' "Re:
Person I Knew". It's not a traditional 12-bar blues but it is very
much blues-based.
So if I'm guilty of anything, it is presenting my argument against
two blues tunes in a row in the narrow and simplistic way that I
did. It's still a pet peeve of mine and it will remain so. But if
you insist on playing two or three or however many in a row, can
you consider changing at least one of the following: style, tempo,
key (higher, lower, major, minor), instrumentation or anything else
that I've failed to think of? (You never know when I may be listening!)
To some of you I may have seemed as tone-deaf as MGM's executive
producer Irving Thalberg was back in the 1930's. As brilliant as he
was, he knew nothing about music. During a preview screening of one
film, he was distressed by the music he was hearing. He asked what
was wrong with it. One of his staff, knowing of Thalberg's total
lack of musical knowledge, told him the problem was the use of minor
chords. The very next day he issued a decree to MGM's staff
composers stating "From the above date, onward, no music in an MGM
film is to contain a minor chord". That memo was still hanging on
the wall in the 1950's during Andre Previn's tenure there. "No Minor
Chords" was the title Previn chose for his autobiography in the early
1990's. I'd suggest making a plaque for me that says "No More Blues"
but I think that title's already been taken.
As for the "Spanish Inquisition" reference I made in my reply to
Eric, I was referring to an old Monty Python sketch.
Enuf sed, I am off to bed. And let's hope the same can be said of
this discussion.
Doug Crane
dcrane at comcast.net
KUVO Denver 89.3 FM
Wednesdays 7-9 PM
More information about the jazzproglist
mailing list